------=_NextPart_000_00BE_01BE6A63.4A21FAC0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On the current topic of Categories and category granularity, CDDB =
has it all wrong. It's current 'official' categories are horribly =
unrepresentative of what is in its database. 50% of the entries are =
under 'Rock' alone. A new category system would have to either more =
granular or much more dynamic. Here's an idea just from the top of my =
head. Each entry has two categories, the main category from the official =
list, and a secondary category that is set by submitters indicating a =
more appropriate category if need be. The database would over time tally =
these secondary categories and determine whether a new official category =
should be generated. Bien?
-Paul=20
=20
------=_NextPart_000_00BE_01BE6A63.4A21FAC0
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">