The project is not dead -- I haven't had time in the last month to add any
new features. I should be able to dedicate some time to this project within
the next couple of weeks.
However, I guess it comes down to this:
Do people feel that this project is worth continuing? Every time I add a new
feature it seems that I get emails from people telling me that it is not
good enough or not enough and more features are needed. Aside from Marc
Woerkom, all we've got are armchair programmers that are constantly bitching
at my work. Not exactly motivating.
I would love to continue this project, but working on it alone is very
frustrating.
Re: XML Nick posted this a while ago:
>Anyone who is working with GPL code, or prefers not to use C++ (which
>is what I presume is implied by STL) might want to check out libxml
>
>http://rufus.w3.org/veillard/XML/xml.html
--ruaok Freezerburn! All else is only icing. -- Soul Coughing
Robert Kaye -- robert nospam at moon.eorbit.net http://moon.eorbit.net/~robert
----- Original Message -----
From: Espen Skoglund <esk nospam at ira.uka.de>
To: <cdindex nospam at freeamp.org>
Sent: Friday, September 17, 1999 7:48 AM
Subject: Is cdindex being developed at all
> I took a look at the CVS archives, and found that the last commit was
> August 16th. Is the cdindex being developed at all? I was thinking
> of adding some support for it in Xmms, but I don't feel like writing
> an XML parser and everything to interpret the results. Are there any
> ongoing work on the cdi_lib?
>
> BTW, I don't like the idea of providing a general cdi_lib interface in
> C++. A regular C interface is preferred if cdindex is going to be
> integrated into other applications (which probably is the whole idea
> of having cdindex in the first place).
>
> eSk
>