On Tue, Mar 09, 1999 at 08:06:49AM -0700, Matthew Mastracci wrote: > > The only really good thing about the CDDB protocol is that it allows a > disc which almost matches the ID to be picked out, just in case there > are multiple versions of a disc with different properties. I suggest > adding a few bytes to the request that represent the *raw* value of the > following: > > Total track time > Total number of tracks > Length of track 1 > Length of last track > > This way, you can track a disc from a different production run by doing > a search for a disc which has had a few of its identifying features > altered by simply picking each of the albums in the database which are > within +/- 2% or so of each of the above criteria. >
Yes. Use as much of CDDB as we can! (forgive me if I sound like a ranting
idiot)