Re: The competition (CDDB2)
Stephen van Egmond (svanegmond nospam at home.com)
Thu, 02 Dec 1999 15:06:38 -0500
Julia Klein wrote:
> This also gives us a leg up -- CDDB is notoriouslz difficult to work with and their licenses suck (as you decribed above) Rather than switching to CDDB2 and dealing with a new license I hope that the CD player folks will switch to the CD Index since it should be easier and there will be no need for any license with us.
A great idea. But we need a library we can use... yesterday. Call a
function, get an XML or a struct back that describes the CD. It's not
there yet.
Shall I revive the "let's design an API" discussions?
/Steve